|
WEB
EXCLUSIVE: City fights off Gwinnett
Published
August 8, 2008
LOGANVILLE – In a classic case of David
versus Goliath, the City of Loganville successfully fought off
an effort by Gwinnett County to prevent it from considering an
annexation and re-zoning request that could result in a Hampton
Inn on the corner of Brand and Oak Grove roads.
In the first test case since the state
enacted the new legislation, an arbitration panel of five
disinterested parties from across the state assembled in
Loganville council chambers Thursday to hear arguments from both
sides.
In the end, the arbitration panel voted 5 — 0
in favor of Loganville getting the opportunity to consider an
application by Danny Herrmann of Diversified Development to
annex and re-zone 3.8 acres currently zoned residential.
Indications were the application, now likely to go before the
city, would be for an upscale hotel — such as a Hampton Inn —
and several retail outparcels.
“Both sides did a great job but I believe you
were given an indefensible position to work with,” arbitrator
Bob Sosebee said to attorneys for Gwinnett County. “I believe
the only reason this came up was as a test case.”
Although objections under the new legislation
— which gives counties the ability to object to an annexation on
the basis it puts a material increased burden on the county —
have been raised before, this was the first time it has gone
before an arbitration panel. Sosebee, a councilman with the City
of Commerce, went on to suggest future cases be worked out
between the county and cities before incurring the expense of
the arbitration hearing. Under the statute, the county raising
the objection gets to bear 75 percent of the costs incurred with
the panel deciding who foots the bill for the balance. In this
case, the panel recommended the remaining 25 percent be split
50-50 between the city and the county.
Attorney Robyn Webb, representing Loganville,
said she believed the city should be able to hear the case and
make a decision before having to go through the arbitration
process. At this point the city’s planning commission and the
city council have yet to hear Diversified’s application.
“But that’s not how it’s set up and that’s
for the state legislature to address,” Webb said. “The greater
financial burden at the moment is on cities. Counties have
attorneys on staff but most cities, unless they’re the City of
Atlanta, don’t.”
Gwinnett County has 10 days to appeal the
decision of the arbitration panel in the Superior Court of
Gwinnett County. Attorneys for the county said they couldn’t
comment on whether that is something they are considering at
this time.
If no objection is raised, Hermann is free to
make an application for the annexation and re-zoning to the City
of Loganville under the normal avenues available. At that time,
residents in and around the development will have the right to
attend the Loganville planning and zoning and city council
public hearings to voice their opinions on the proposed
development.
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Study shows value of quick settlements
By National Law Journal
|
A study of court settlements of
personal injury lawsuits against businesses
estimated companies could save an average of
$114,000 per claim, or $670,000 for severe injuries,
by promptly settling cases instead of fighting them
in court.
The study, which was published
this month in the Columbia Business Law Review, also
projected $32,000 in savings from lower legal
expenses, or about $211,000 for cases involving
severe injuries.
The study based the projections
on how much it would cost businesses to make “early
offers” to pay out-of-pocket medical expenses and
wage losses of injured claimants. The quick
settlements would reduce legal fees and “pain and
suffering” damages.
Jeffrey O'Connel of the
University of Virginia School of Law's and Patricia
Born of California State University-Northridge wrote
the study, which analyzed settlements of personal
injury and defective product injury cases against
companies between 1988 and 2004 in Texas and
Florida.
The
study proposes an early-offer system that would give
businesses 180 days to offer claimants no-fault-like
payments of medical expenses and wage losses not
otherwise covered, plus an additional 10 percent for
attorney fees. Although claimants would not be
compensated for pain and suffering, the study
predicted a payment wait time of 2 1/2 years less
than going to court.
Under the model, claimants
could only turn down offers if the defendants'
actions involved gross misconduct, which the study
found only involves about 4 percent of business
liability cases.
“Thus a crucial element of the
tort system's deterrence mechanism is retained:
Injured parties could still win suitably large
monetary awards under the early-offers model for
both economic and noneconomic damages in clear cases
of aggravated error,” O'Connell said.
|
|